“Tudangeng Mallajang”: A Symbol of Transcendence at Gerindra’s National Gathering

The empty chairs at Gerindra’s anniversary celebration are more than just a symbol—they serve as a reminder of the sacrifices made by the party’s late cadres. This tradition underscores that their contributions will never be forgotten and that their spirit continues to inspire future generations.

Through this gesture, Gerindra reaffirms that the party is not merely a political entity but also a home for those who remain steadfast in their fight for the nation and its people.

The **Gerindra Party** (Partai Gerakan Indonesia Raya, or Great Indonesia Movement Party) is one of Indonesia’s most influential political parties, known for its nationalist and populist platform. Founded on February 6, 2008, by Prabowo Subianto, a former military general and son-in-law of Indonesia’s second president, Suharto, Gerindra was established to promote a vision of strong governance, social justice, and economic equality. The party emphasizes Indonesian unity, sovereignty, and pride in the nation’s cultural heritage, advocating for policies that benefit the common people, such as agrarian reform, affordable healthcare, and education. With its soaring eagle logo and slogan, **”Bersama Rakyat, Indonesia Menang”** (Together with the People, Indonesia Wins), Gerindra has built a strong identity rooted in nationalism and populism.

Gerindra’s political influence has grown significantly since its founding. The party has consistently performed well in legislative and presidential elections, with Prabowo Subianto running as its presidential candidate in 2014, 2019, and finally winning the presidency in 2024. This victory marked a major milestone for the party, solidifying its position as a dominant force in Indonesian politics. Gerindra has also been part of various coalitions, including the opposition during Joko Widodo’s (Jokowi) presidency and later joining the government coalition. Its ability to adapt and build alliances has been both a strength and a point of criticism, with some viewing its shifting alliances as opportunistic.